A group of illegal immigrants is suing the state of
Oregon to overturn a voter-approved initiative that denied them driver’s
licenses.
The lawsuit, brought by five illegal immigrants, comes after Oregonians passed Measure 88 last year with a strong two-thirds majority. Thirty-five of Oregon’s 36 counties voted against licenses for illegal immigrants as did every congressional district in the state, most of which are represented by Democrats.
The lawsuit, brought by five illegal immigrants, comes after Oregonians passed Measure 88 last year with a strong two-thirds majority. Thirty-five of Oregon’s 36 counties voted against licenses for illegal immigrants as did every congressional district in the state, most of which are represented by Democrats.
But the lawsuit alleges Measure 88 is unconstitutional
because it "arbitrarily" denies driving privileges based on
membership in a "disfavored minority group." It alleges Oregon voters
were motivated by "animus toward persons from Mexico and Central
America."
Gustavo Recarde, who has worked construction and odd jobs in Portland and several states since sneaking into the United States in 1988, said a driver's license would help him feel more comfortable here and open doors.
Gustavo Recarde, who has worked construction and odd jobs in Portland and several states since sneaking into the United States in 1988, said a driver's license would help him feel more comfortable here and open doors.
"If an illegal [can] get a driver's license, it would
be better because there's more opportunities to find a job as a driver,"
said Recarde, who is not part of the lawsuit. He said he believes race played a
role in the vote.
But Cynthia Kendoll, president of Oregonians for Immigration
Reform, said it's not the responsibility of Oregonians to make illegal
immigrants comfortable or able to drive to jobs they don't legally have.
"They came here by choice, they weren't brought here
against their will, and with those choices come hardships," she said.
Measure 88 was a public vote that
prevents giving "driver's cards" to those who cannot prove
they are in the U.S. legally.
The campaign to deny licenses won big despite being outspent 10-to-one.
The campaign to deny licenses won big despite being outspent 10-to-one.
"People were not swayed by their arguments that they
deserve to have a driver's card so they could more easily get to their
jobs," Kendoll said. "They're not supposed to be working here."
Kendoll said Oregonians were motivated by national security
and drug-smuggling by Mexican cartels, not race. Those without papers have not
gone through immigration checks, she said, and licenses make it easier to
transport narcotics up and down the West Coast.
Norman Williams, associate dean for academic affairs at the
Willamette University College of Law in Salem, said:
"The U.S. Supreme Court has been clear that neither
legislators nor voters may target a minority group because of their race or
ethnicity," he said.
The plaintiffs -- five illegal immigrants identified only by
their initials -- don't have to prove every Oregon voter was racially
motivated, he said.
"They do have to establish there were enough voters who
voted 'no' who were prompted to do so because of racial concerns, that could
have tipped the balance," he said.
Still, Williams said they face an uphill battle.
"Federal judges are very hesitant to strike down state
statutes on constitutional grounds," he said.
0 comments:
Post a Comment